<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re being watched&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://72kilowatts.com/2008/06/27/youre-being-watched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://72kilowatts.com/2008/06/27/youre-being-watched/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Google Analytics, and Pontification</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Webster</title>
		<link>http://72kilowatts.com/2008/06/27/youre-being-watched/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72kilowatts.com/?p=48#comment-63</guid>
		<description>There&#39;s other reasons though.  Certainly, dropping a bad manager is never a bad thing.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Especially in the case of OPM&#39;s we&#39;ve seen programs bring them on because of their popularity, then drop them after a short recruiting period.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And I guess that&#39;s ok too.  Some affiliates, however, do prefer to work with certain OPMs, and if they build sites based on the fact that a specific OPM is managing a program, they tend to get ticked if they&#39;re gone *unexpectedly*.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#39;s a dangerous premise though.  With very few exceptions, OPMs move on quite frequently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s other reasons though.  Certainly, dropping a bad manager is never a bad thing.  </p>
<p>Especially in the case of OPM&#39;s we&#39;ve seen programs bring them on because of their popularity, then drop them after a short recruiting period.</p>
<p>And I guess that&#39;s ok too.  Some affiliates, however, do prefer to work with certain OPMs, and if they build sites based on the fact that a specific OPM is managing a program, they tend to get ticked if they&#39;re gone *unexpectedly*.</p>
<p>It&#39;s a dangerous premise though.  With very few exceptions, OPMs move on quite frequently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scohaz</title>
		<link>http://72kilowatts.com/2008/06/27/youre-being-watched/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>scohaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72kilowatts.com/?p=48#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Does that mean that a merchant should keep a worthless AM who either does nothing or knows nothing or both? I have seen many merchants switch AMs and head in a MUCH better direction. Let&#39;s face it...there are lots of AMs &#038; OPMs out there who don&#39;t belong in the space. If a merchant made a bad decision they have to fix it. &lt;br&gt;With all due respect, for someone to drop an affiliate program that replaces poor management is terribly short-sited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that mean that a merchant should keep a worthless AM who either does nothing or knows nothing or both? I have seen many merchants switch AMs and head in a MUCH better direction. Let&#39;s face it&#8230;there are lots of AMs &#038; OPMs out there who don&#39;t belong in the space. If a merchant made a bad decision they have to fix it. <br />With all due respect, for someone to drop an affiliate program that replaces poor management is terribly short-sited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
